bdx-ai/gpt-6-sol · rank 5 of 9
GPT 6 Sol
- Provider
- BDX AI
- Family
- GPT Sol
- Released
- Release date not published
- Closed weights
Cinderline
cinderlinegenerated 2026-09-22Touch ready
Proven continuous flame cone, measured 16.5 to 27.8 degrees with range
4 verified findings · touch ready · 5 audited dimensions
The live canvas starts when the window reaches your screen and stops when you scroll away.
Showdown Score
58.00/100
DevelopingShowdown Score v2strict source-code audit#5 of 9
Build report
The record this page's number is drawn from: one audited build, one score, and the provenance of both.
Implementation-level audit
- Generated
- 2026-09-22
- Audit method
- Showdown Score v2 · strict source-code audit
- Dimensions
- 5 × 20 pts
- Verified findings
- 4 · 2 failing
- Build id
- cinderline
- Evaluator
- local-manual-eval
Suite: Zombie Flamethrower Showdown · round September 2026 · one manual run per model, so intervals are zero-width. Scoring rules, the withdrawn v1 method, and the limits of this round are in Methodology.
Evaluation breakdown
Where the 58.00 came from: 5 dimensions × 20 points. Each bar is the points awarded; under it is the verified evidence, and the defect that cost it what it lost.
0 pass · 4 partial · 1 failure
Verified Touch layer verified end to end: virtual stick plus autofire
- Costs this dimensionTouch input lockout after restart
Verified Proven continuous flame cone, measured 16.5 to 27.8 degrees with range
- Costs this dimensionKnockback entirely absent
No capability recorded in the audit's implementation log for this dimension.
- Costs this dimensionNo boss, no upgrades, no music
No capability recorded in the audit's implementation log for this dimension.
No verified defect recorded on this dimension.
Verified Functional combo multiplier that genuinely climbs
- Costs this dimensionHit flash saturates to solid white
Bars: ≥16 pass · 10–15 partial pass · <10 failure · source audit 2026-09-22 · build cinderline
A feature earns points only when it is implemented and reachable — on-screen strings, comments, and dead code score zero. Full scoring rules in Methodology.
Prompt used
What was actually asked. The same text, verbatim and untuned, for every model in the round.
One prompt · 9 models · 11 audited builds
“make me a video game where i am killing zombies with fire and all please? a nice wonderfull game i can play for fun okay?”
| Benchmark | Score | Build | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zombie Flamethrower Showdown | 58.00 | cinderline |
Showdown Score v2: strict source-code audit, five dimensions x 20 points. Community vote remains open in the interactive store. Every other benchmark dimension — reasoning, math, knowledge, pricing, throughput — is unmeasured for this build and is shown as such rather than estimated.
Failures found
Most benchmarks hide failures. These Cinderline defects were observed in the source and in play, worst first, and each one is why the score above is not higher.
2 failing2 partial pass0 known issue
Knockback entirely absent
Failure
Enemies have no velocity field, so the firebomb — the only impact weapon — deals zero push.
Dimension costed · Combat
Touch input lockout after restart
Failure
reset() leaves stale pointer ids, so both virtual sticks are dead for the rest of the session.
Dimension costed · Controls
Hit flash saturates to solid white
Partial pass
The cone re-applies the 130ms flash every frame, so a burning enemy is permanently white and the impact signal is destroyed.
Dimension costed · Polish
No boss, no upgrades, no music
Partial pass
Three reskinned stat sticks and numeric wave scaling only.
Dimension costed · Content
Severity follows the audit contract: failure = the build cannot do the thing it advertises · partial pass = implemented but wrong · known issue = cosmetic or unreachable. A feature that only appears in a comment, an on-screen string, or unreachable code is not credited anywhere on this page.
Capability radar
Capability dimensions are Not evaluated for this build.
View radar values as a list
- ReasoningNot evaluated
- CodingNot evaluated
- MathNot evaluated
- KnowledgeNot evaluated
- VisionNot evaluated
- AgenticNot evaluated
Price and speed
0 of 5 measured
- Input / 1M tokens
- Not measured
- Output / 1M tokens
- Not measured
- Throughput
- Not measured
- Time to first token
- Not measured
- Context window
- Not measured
Pricing and speed were not measured for these builds. Values will appear here once vendor pricing and throughput runs are published — nothing on this page is filled in from a comparable model.
Score history
1 evaluated round
Rounds evaluated
1
Snapshot
58.00
Round date
GPT 6 Sol has one evaluated round. A trend appears here only once a second independent round exists — a line drawn through a single measurement would imply a change that was never measured.
Related models
9 models · one prompt
Every model answered the same prompt. Scores are Showdown Score v2, so the numbers are comparable; the leaderboard adds the dimension-level evidence behind them.
Comments
Loading comments…
Community comments — stored on this server